Examination didn't find Yesypenko’s fingerprints on seized grenade
The dactyloscopic examination did not find Vladyslav Yesipenko’s fingerprints on a grenade the investigators had seized, said Oleksiy Ladin, defense counsel of the journalist for Krym.Realii (Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty project) arrested in Crimea.
“On May 5, investigative actions were undertaken involving Vladyslav Yesypenko in the building of the FSB headquarters. During the investigative procedure, the defense got acquainted with the conclusion of the dactyloscopic examination, holding that no Vladyslav Yesypenko's fingerprints were found on the grenade, which they had seized from him ” as Ladin said.
The lawyer also confirmed that another charge had been brought against his client.
“The investigator briefed us with the resolution on merging the criminal cases. There were two criminal cases, in one of which Yesypenko was accused of making explosives, the other was about its storage. Now they have been joined in one. And, subsequently, a new terminal charge against Vladyslav Yesypenko will most probably be the accusation under Part 1 of Article 222.1 and Part 1 of Article 223-1, ie the manufacture and storage of explosives, ” as Ladin explained.
As IMI reported, on May 5, it became known that the occupation in Crimea have filed a new charge against the arrested journalist of Radio Liberty Vladyslav Yesypenko: an illegal acquisition, transfer, sale, storage, or carrying of weapons and ammunition (Art. 222 of the Criminal Code).
Earlier, the journalist was charged only under Art. 223-1. Of the Criminal Code ("Illegal manufacture of explosives, illegal manufacture, processing or repair of explosive devices").
As IMI reported, on April 30, the Russian-controlled Kyiv District Court of Simferopol extended his arrest for two months more, until July 11
As IMI reported, on April 13, Vladislav Yesipenko's lawyer Oleksiy Ladin said that his client was threatened with murder by a FSB officer if he withheld his previous testimony he made under torture.
On April 12, Ladin reported that in the first days after his detention, the FSB had illegally taken saliva from Esipenko for a biological examination.
On April 9, As IMI reported, on April 12, Russian FSB officers in Crimea threatened the execution to Vladyslav Yesypenko, an arrested contributor to Radio Liberty (Crimea.Reality RFE/RL project), after he accused the FSB of torturing him before the Crimean court..
As IMI reported, on April 6, Vladyslav Yesipenko said that FSB investigators had tortured him. He said this on April 6 during a session of the Supreme Court of Crimea.
On March 10, on March 10, n March 10, Russian FSB officers detained Vladislav Yesipenko, a freelancer of Radio Svoboda (Crimea.Realities project), in the occupied Crimea. Yesipenko took part in the action dedicated to Taras Shevchenko's anniversary, which took place in Simferopol on March 9. The arrest term is until May 11.
Yesipenko is accused of gathering information "in the interests of Ukraine's special services," including for the Foreign Intelligence Service, the Russian FSB's Public Relations Center reported on March 16. According to the FSB, Yesipenko "carried out photo and video recording of the area, livelihoods and places of mass stay of people in the Crimea."
Human rights activists said Yesipenko was denied access to an independent lawyer and called for his release .
On March 12, it became known that Yesipenko was being held in a temporary detention facility in Simferopol.
On March 19, it became known that Vladyslav Yesipenko was accused of espionage in favor of the secret services of Ukraine. Human rights activists do not exclude that the FSB would use physical pressure on him.
The same day, his wife claimed she feared for his lige and health. "I want to say once again that I fear for the life and health of my husband, especially after yesterday's video. This video is another proof of beatings, torture and abuse of a person. This is confirmed by the non-admission of two independent lawyers to her husband,” as Kateryna said.
According to her, there were traces of beatings on his face and neck. In addition, despite the fact that she sent him a parcel with clothes, he was given someone else's clothes, under which they tried to hide something.
"The shape of the body was visually disproportionate, that is, I assume that he had something disguised under his clothes: either a device or a corset," the woman suggested.